Mar 4, 2010

When we designed our 128GB Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB flash drive we expected that we would end up with a pretty high performance USB flash drive on our hands. We designed it bottom-up for speed by using a rather novel dual-controller architecture, in an attempt to bypass some of the limitations of the UFD controllers that were in production at that time.

We didn’t realize JUST how fast it was, though, until we tested it against some competitive 128GB USB flash drives. We ran both synthetic benchmarks and real-world tests to determine how we did against the competition. And, we were pretty pleased with the results!

Corsair Flash Voyager GT 128GB vs Kingston 128GB
Data Traveler vs. ST Luxio 128GB

Test Setup
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Memory: 4GB
Motherboard: EVGA 680i
Video Card: Nvidia 8800 GTS
HDD: WD Raptor 74GB
OS: Windows Vista 32Bit SP1
UFD Format: NTFS

Benchmark Results

CrystalDiskMark 2.2

Part

Sequential Read

Sequential Write

Random Read 512K

Random Write 512K

Random Read 4K

Random Write 4K

128GB Flash Voyager GT

32.6 MB/s

28.8 MB/s

32.5MB/s

23.0 MB/s

4.4 MB/s

1.1 MB/s

128GB Kingston

32. 5 MB/s

19.1 MB/s

32.3 MB/s

2.7 MB/s

6.6 MB/s

0.02 MB/s

128GB Super Talent

21.5 MB/s

17.5 MB/s

21.5 MB/s

2.0 MB/s

6.1 MB/s

0.02 MB/s

HDBench 3.50

Part

Sequential Read

Sequential Write

Random Read

Random Write

128GB Flash Voyager GT

32.6 MB/s

28.8 MB/s

32.5MB/s

23.0 MB/s

128GB Kingston

31.4 MB/s

13.2 MB/s

30.7 MB/s

5.2 MB/s

128GB Super Talent

20.7 MB/s

12.9 MB/s

20.7 MB/s

5.5 MB/s

Copy/ Transfer files from PC to UFD elapsed time

Part

2,600 MP3’s (16GB)

3GB WMV Video

5,200 MP3’s (32GB)

513 Random Files (JPG, MOV)

128GB Flash Voyager GT

12m 35s

2m 11s

26m 15s

1m 58s

128GB Kingston

31m 35s

3m 33s

69m 01s

4m 09s

128GB Super Talent

33m 24s

3m 47s

67m 23s

3m 50s